Loophole Exposed in Starting Lineups

For the original MTFFL.
Post Reply
The Commish
Posts: 3523
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 4:52 pm
Name: Jeff Wolfe
MTFFL: Z-Town Zippers *1998*
MTFFL II: Beer Swillers
Location: MTFFL International Headquarters

Loophole Exposed in Starting Lineups

Post by wolfe » Mon Nov 08, 2010 7:01 pm

We noticed a loophole in the lineup requirements on MyFantasyLeague. There are a couple of ways to fix the problem, but it would require slight changes to the current league settings.

See discussion here

What opinions do you have?
I like the formations option and have thought about it since I saw it available last year. But it allows one combination of players that we don't allow today (RB: 1,WR: 1,TE: 3). And it doesn't allow one combination that we currently allow (RB=0 WR=3 TE=2). We can pick and choose which formations to allow in the settings.
The rules are fair. The regulations are fair.

Smack Room Regular
Posts: 159
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 2:45 pm
Name: Ernie Goens
MTFFL: Eazy's Rockers *2015*

Re: Loophole Exposed in Starting Lineups

Post by eazye187 » Mon Nov 08, 2010 7:34 pm

Considering how seldom someone would run the Jumbo Wing (2WR, 3TE) formation at all, I say we put in the formations which will close the loophole yet still allow all of the same flexibility.

User avatar
Jonathan S.
God of Smack Talk
Posts: 2950
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 8:13 am
Name: Jonathan Smallwood
MTFFL: Sheffield Feagle Eagles *1999,2002,2003,2006*
MTFFL II: Gainesboro by Gods *2006*
Location: Up in the UC

Re: Loophole Exposed in Starting Lineups

Post by Jonathan S. » Tue Nov 09, 2010 9:45 am

I like the jumbo wing option.
You better get on your knees and pray...Sheffield and Gainesboro are on the way.

Post Reply