Bellamy Bowl XII
- Jonathan S.
- God of Smack Talk
- Posts: 2955
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 8:13 am
- Name: Jonathan Smallwood
- MTFFL: Sheffield Feagle Eagles *1999,2002,2003,2006,2021*
- MTFFL II: Gainesboro by Gods *2006*
- Location: Up in the UC
Bellamy Bowl XII
The Bellamy Bowl came down to HFA...6.9 points.
You better get on your knees and pray...Sheffield and Gainesboro are on the way.
-
wolfe
- The Commish
- Posts: 3618
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 4:52 pm
- Name: Jeff Wolfe
- MTFFL: Z-Town Zippers *1998, 2018*
- MTFFL II: Beer Swillers
- Location: MTFFL International Headquarters
- Contact:
Re: Bellamy Bowl XII
I think it was that bullshit -8 points that Cutler lost on interceptions and fumbles. When are we going to change this stupid bullshit?
The rules are fair. The regulations are fair.
- wagordy
- Smack Talking Beast
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 9:59 pm
- Name: Will Gordy
- MTFFL: Nashville Salamanders *2010*
- Location: Stuck in Paydirt!!!
Re: Bellamy Bowl XII
I was pissed. How can 3 starters not score me enough point to overcome a very attainable amount of points. Damn Steve Smith running bad routes! Good Game Jonathan.
Nashville Salamanders, the only team to win a division with a sub .500 record.
- wagordy
- Smack Talking Beast
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 9:59 pm
- Name: Will Gordy
- MTFFL: Nashville Salamanders *2010*
- Location: Stuck in Paydirt!!!
Re: Bellamy Bowl XII
Are you referring to negative points for fumbles and Interceptions?wolfe wrote:I think it was that bullshit -8 points that Cutler lost on interceptions and fumbles. When are we going to change this stupid bullshit?
Nashville Salamanders, the only team to win a division with a sub .500 record.
-
wolfe
- The Commish
- Posts: 3618
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 4:52 pm
- Name: Jeff Wolfe
- MTFFL: Z-Town Zippers *1998, 2018*
- MTFFL II: Beer Swillers
- Location: MTFFL International Headquarters
- Contact:
Re: Bellamy Bowl XII
Yes. Most people use a crutch for why their teams loose -- except their own bad decisions. I just thought I'd join in.
You should have started Pierre.
You should have started Pierre.
The rules are fair. The regulations are fair.
- Jonathan S.
- God of Smack Talk
- Posts: 2955
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 8:13 am
- Name: Jonathan Smallwood
- MTFFL: Sheffield Feagle Eagles *1999,2002,2003,2006,2021*
- MTFFL II: Gainesboro by Gods *2006*
- Location: Up in the UC
Re: Bellamy Bowl XII
I was only commenting on the irony of it all.....no ancillary comments were needed from the Wolfe.
You better get on your knees and pray...Sheffield and Gainesboro are on the way.
- Jonathan S.
- God of Smack Talk
- Posts: 2955
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 8:13 am
- Name: Jonathan Smallwood
- MTFFL: Sheffield Feagle Eagles *1999,2002,2003,2006,2021*
- MTFFL II: Gainesboro by Gods *2006*
- Location: Up in the UC
Re: Bellamy Bowl XII
I was only commenting on the irony of it all.....no ancillary comments were needed from the Wolfe.
You better get on your knees and pray...Sheffield and Gainesboro are on the way.
- Oompa Midgets
- SmackBot 3000
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:10 pm
- Name: Anthony Fowler
- MTFFL: Oompa Loompas *2004,2007*
- MTFFL II: Bitter Midgets *2008, 2009, 2010*
- Location: Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory
- Contact:
Re: Bellamy Bowl XII
So we can bench HFA?wolfe wrote:Yes. Most people use a crutch for why their teams loose -- except their own bad decisions. I just thought I'd join in.
You should have started Pierre.
Points for nothing (HFA) versus points from a player's performance. Which can possibly fluctuate week to week?
I propose we add a 7-point Road Team Disadvantage (RTD). Not to be confused with STD.
- Jonathan S.
- God of Smack Talk
- Posts: 2955
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 8:13 am
- Name: Jonathan Smallwood
- MTFFL: Sheffield Feagle Eagles *1999,2002,2003,2006,2021*
- MTFFL II: Gainesboro by Gods *2006*
- Location: Up in the UC
Re: Bellamy Bowl XII
Yes...it is ironic:
"incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result"
One would expect the proponent of HFA to win by it's bonus rather than the opponent of HFA. Any rebuttal? I don't think so. There's the irony of it.
"incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result"
One would expect the proponent of HFA to win by it's bonus rather than the opponent of HFA. Any rebuttal? I don't think so. There's the irony of it.
You better get on your knees and pray...Sheffield and Gainesboro are on the way.