Page 2 of 6
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:37 am
by eazye187
Oompa Midgets wrote:Jonathan S. wrote:Those are the breaks for the wildcard team.
The rules are fair. The regulations are fair.
It is more of a disadvantage for the #1 seed than the wild card! You know the wild card has to play the #1 seed regardless. It just sucks that the #1 seed does not play the weakest playoff team.....
It is what it is and no system is perfect
That's also what I was trying to get at. We're almost in a no win situation.
AMENDMENT!!!
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:02 pm
by Jonathan S.
Well, those are the breaks. You two aren't the first to encounter such a quandry.
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:19 pm
by Oompa Midgets
maybe the playoff teams should be seeded by record
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:09 pm
by wagordy
I would tend to agree. It is fine for the highest non division leading team with the most points win the wild card but it does seem logical to seed by record after that. Well just bring it up next year to vote to change the rule.
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:20 pm
by Oompa Midgets
I second that motion...
In the meantime, GO OMICRON!
Can the 0-11 team beat the 10-1?!?
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:57 am
by Jonathan S.
Don't look now, but here come the EAGLES! E-A-G-L-E-S...EAGLES!!!!!!!
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:44 pm
by Oompa Midgets
i want to insert Ryan Grant into my week 13 starting lineup
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:16 pm
by Oompa Midgets
Some leagues allow the #1 seed to pick who they want to play in the first round!
Just one more possibility.....
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:51 pm
by Jonathan S.
Ridiculous.
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:21 pm
by Oompa Midgets
I agree, your season has been nothing short of ridiculous. Way to represent. I bet Ernie thinks you suck at fantasy football!