Page 4 of 7
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:43 pm
by Agitator
wolfe wrote:What do the employees of Home Depot have to do with Vick?
the owner owns Home Depot.... if he doesn't do anything to Vick, then they could riot! ok....maybe not riot....ok....maybe not even protest; i was just trying to start an argument.
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:40 pm
by wolfe
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:42 pm
by wolfe
Nike had already stopped sales of his shoe due to be released soon. Reebok doesn't have a contract with Vick, but is the NFL's equipment provider. I wonder if the NFL requested this of Reebok.
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:31 am
by wolfe
Upper Deck & Donruss have removed Vick from their 2007 cards.
NFLShop.com has pulled all Vick merchandise.
Nike suspends its contract with Vick.
This guy can't possibly play this season, right? His trial doesn't start until after Week 12. That would be 12 weeks of booing, spitting, cursing and lots of other unmentionable fan behavior. They can't let this guy walk on the field - not even at home.
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:08 am
by Agitator
wolfe wrote:Upper Deck & Donruss have removed Vick from their 2007 cards.
NFLShop.com has pulled all Vick merchandise.
Nike suspends its contract with Vick.
talk about tarnishing the leagues image! i don't understand why they would even wait to see what happens at the trial before suspending him...
he is losing all of his endorsements.... i guess roger gaydell doesn't have the balls to suspend a superstar!
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 11:29 am
by wolfe
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:16 pm
by bilyeuofbaxter
I'm no doctor but I think there are two bones in the forearm.
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:49 pm
by wolfe
The NFL won't allow the 2007 QB challenge to be televised because Vick was there. It's like they are trying to erase his existence.
http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2007/08/ ... b-michael/
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:53 pm
by Oompa Midgets
wouldn't you if he was one of your employees?!?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:50 am
by Oompa Midgets