What do you guys think about making one mandatory, and reducing the # of starting RBs to a max of 2?
Should make the game more "realistic" while also adding parity.
TEs
-
Oompa Midgets
- SmackBot 3000
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:10 pm
- Name: Anthony Fowler
- MTFFL: Oompa Loompas *2004,2007*
- MTFFL II: Bitter Midgets *2008, 2009, 2010*
- Location: Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory
- Contact:
-
Oompa Midgets
- SmackBot 3000
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:10 pm
- Name: Anthony Fowler
- MTFFL: Oompa Loompas *2004,2007*
- MTFFL II: Bitter Midgets *2008, 2009, 2010*
- Location: Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory
- Contact:
Re: TEs
Please elaborate. Why are you against making a TE mandatory? 1 TE and 2 RBs is WAY more normal than 3 RBs and 0 TEs. There are 32 starting TEs so each team could easily have 2 starters. The only thing it would hurt would be our chances of surpassing previous scoring records.
-
Jonathan S.
- God of Smack Talk
- Posts: 2955
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 8:13 am
- Name: Jonathan Smallwood
- MTFFL: Sheffield Feagle Eagles *1999,2002,2003,2006,2021*
- MTFFL II: Gainesboro by Gods *2006*
- Location: Up in the UC
Re: TEs
Why do people constantly try and change perfection (except for HFA) every year!?!
You better get on your knees and pray...Sheffield and Gainesboro are on the way.
-
the Man, the Myth...
- Smack Talking Beast
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 12:23 pm
- Name: John Flatt
- MTFFL: Putnam Punishers *2012, 2013, 2016*
- MTFFL II: Smyrna Havoc *2011, 2012*
- Location: Murfreesboro,TN
Re: TEs
I am not in favor of it being mandatory for a TE to start. The starting line-ups are fine the way they are in my opinion.
...The Legend