Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:22 pm
by Oompa Midgets
why wouldn't they earn the same points if everyone gets half a point per reception???
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:30 pm
by wolfe
I think I was assuming (based on bstock's post) that you were suggesting different points for RB's and WR's.
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:18 pm
by thechosenone
well, i am all about the groundskeepers!! i do not understand though why we do not give minus points for missed field goals or pats.
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:09 pm
by Oompa Midgets
that was part b of my plan if anyone argues the kicker scoring change!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i say do FGs based on yards, AND do -1 for missed FGs or extra points!!!!!
and no wolfe, bstock is just an idiot...he reads things that arent there!!!
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:29 pm
by bstock
my point was that wr receptions points are a decent idea, but you mention an evening out between rb's, which i don't see being great since rb's are catching a lot of balls for certain teams. more points for kickers is swell, i like your idea for the yardage scheme.
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:38 pm
by Oompa Midgets
there is only a small percentage of rbs who have more receptions than a receiver on their team!!!
i just looked and last season there was ONE rb in the top 30 in receptions and Brian Westbrook was #27!!!!!!!!!!!!! there was also 6 TEs which could change our no TEs ever drafted!!! for u who cannot subtract that means 23 WRs were in the top 30!!!
I BELIEVE THIS WOULD MAKE OUR LEAGUES EVEN MORE COMPETITIVE!!!
THESE 2 SCORING ADDITIONS WOULD ALLOW THE KICKERS AND THE TIGHT ENDS TO BECOME PART OF OUR FANTASY GAME THAT THEY HAVEN'T BEEN IN THE PAST!!!!!!!!