RB+WR+TE

Suggestions for improvements or new features/reports that you would like to have.
Post Reply
User avatar
the Man, the Myth...
Smack Talking Beast
Posts: 643
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 12:23 pm
Name: John Flatt
MTFFL: Putnam Punishers *2012, 2013, 2016*
MTFFL II: Smyrna Havoc *2011, 2012*
Location: Murfreesboro,TN

RB+WR+TE

Post by the Man, the Myth... »

Is that something that My Fantasy league changed all on their own? is it something we can switch back? Its much easier to look at your RBs and WRs seperated in my opinion. Just wondering, its not life or death.
...The Legend
User avatar
Oompa Midgets
SmackBot 3000
Posts: 4335
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:10 pm
Name: Anthony Fowler
MTFFL: Oompa Loompas *2004,2007*
MTFFL II: Bitter Midgets *2008, 2009, 2010*
Location: Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory
Contact:

Re: RB+WR+TE

Post by Oompa Midgets »

The commish sent am email and maybe posted in the forum that he made the switch.
I personally agree, and don't like it either. Jmo =)
wolfe
The Commish
Posts: 3616
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 4:52 pm
Name: Jeff Wolfe
MTFFL: Z-Town Zippers *1998, 2018*
MTFFL II: Beer Swillers
Location: MTFFL International Headquarters
Contact:

Re: RB+WR+TE

Post by wolfe »

I don't like it either.

I did it to close a loophole that allowed people to submit too many offensive players. It happened two years ago and I didn't do anything about it. It happened a few weeks ago and the owner of the team was honest enough to tell me about it.

I could only set up flex RB+WR+TE players to equal 5 without controlling how many RB's or TE's were set. It was possible to submit extra offensive players by submitting less defensive players as long as the total player count equaled 13.
The rules are fair. The regulations are fair.
User avatar
Agitator
God of Smack Talk
Posts: 2759
Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 4:19 pm
Name: Mick Reese
MTFFL: * none - cause that league is inferior to MTFFL2
MTFFL II: Agitated Hedgehogs *2004,2005,2007*
Location: The Pig Pen

Re: RB+WR+TE

Post by Agitator »

wolfe wrote:I don't like it either.

I did it to close a loophole that allowed people to submit too many offensive players. It happened two years ago and I didn't do anything about it. It happened a few weeks ago and the owner of the team was honest enough to tell me about it.

I could only set up flex RB+WR+TE players to equal 5 without controlling how many RB's or TE's were set. It was possible to submit extra offensive players by submitting less defensive players as long as the total player count equaled 13.
dammit.... why didn't i figure that out. would have loved to bench a DL or two for a couple more offensive players!
* began the midgets fall from success! --- 2011 *
Post Reply